Great leaders make a huge difference when compared to merely good leaders. The more great leaders you develop in your organisation, the more it will become an outstanding organisation. We believe there is no reason to accept mediocrity in leadership any more than in software programming, customer service, or selling.
How would you respond if we produced data that verified employee satisfaction had a substantially more positive result when there is greater leadership effectiveness? Would that stir your inquisitiveness on how that is possible and implementable?
How about proof that top leaders from a large insurance company cut the average turnover rate in their groups by 10% compared to leaders in the bottom range, and by 5% compared to those in the mid-range? And we know that reduced turnover directly impacts profitability, customer satisfaction, and in this case, claim-resolution speed.
If we indeed produced such figures, what would you do differently? Would you be happy with the good performance in your team, or would you like your team to rise to higher levels, become great leaders; moving your team and perhaps even your organisation to be more outstanding?
Assuming you say you’d like to see them rise to higher levels, after all which leader would want their teams and organisations to remain at a plateau, right, how can it be done? Is it even realistic to have everybody in my organisation to be great leaders or even just my team alone?
Aren’t great leaders born? Can they be made? And can ALL my team members possibly become great leaders? If it is indeed possible, wouldn’t I lose them to competitors after they become great?

Defining a Great Leader
Genetic makeup does appear to account for about one-third of the traits and behaviours that define exceptional leaders[1]. Some people are born with a high energy level, keen intellect and emotional hardiness. These are helpful traits, but they fail to explain the late-blooming leader. They also fail to explain the promising youth who gets derailed and never recovers.
But what makes a great leader great in the first place? What are their traits and behaviours?
A definition of an extremely effective leader offered by Zenger Folkman is one who produces high productivity, low turnover, high customer satisfaction, high profitability, innovation and positive relationships with suppliers. Based on research carried out by them, great leadership consists of possessing several building blocks of capabilities. And each of these building blocks complement the other building blocks.
These building blocks include
- Character
- Personal capabilities
- Focus on results
- Interpersonal skills and
- Leading organisational change
However, possessing just one of these building blocks is not likely to cause you to be rated at the high-percentile in terms of overall leadership. To be a highly effective leader, one needs to have at least one strength under each of these building blocks. But more of that later.

What happens if my leaders are not all great?
The advantage of having great leaders in an organisation is that the organisation will be stronger. Stronger as they are able to be role models for the entire organisation. Stronger as there is now an elevated standard of performance that is set within the organisation. And multiple other reasons.
A company of great leaders results in higher employee satisfaction, net profits and customer satisfaction. It also lowers employee turnover and intention to leave. Who wouldn’t want that, right?
What then happens if my leaders are not all great?
Well, poor leaders naturally have an adverse impact on the groups they try to lead as well as on the overall performance of the organisation they are in. However, it is the results of the middle deciles that would have a significant impact on any organisation. Just take a look at one aspect, employee satisfaction. Based on research, employee satisfaction substantially improves as leadership effectiveness increases.

Source: The Extraordinary Leader: Turning Good Managers Into Great Leaders, John H Zenger & Joseph R Folkman

Can great leaders be developed?
We are convinced that, to a great degree, leaders can be developed.
Based on research and data from hundreds of thousands of leadership assessments by Zenger Folkman from the direct reports of leaders, their peers, bosses and themselves, it is indeed possible to unravel the mystery of leadership, understand the nature of leadership and how best to develop it. These are first-hand studies of leadership based on actual data points, not from experiences or observations of leaders.
For example, based on data gathered from leaders in the healthcare industry across the world, it was found that the five behaviours that drive employee commitment in this industry are:
- Skilful at getting people to stretch for goals that go beyond what they originally thought possible
- Energises others to achieve exceptional results
- Creates an atmosphere of continual improvement in which self and others push to exceed the expected results
- Inspires others to high levels of effort and performance
- Keeps people focused on the highest priority goals
If you knew what the top five behaviours that drove employee commitment in your industry or in your organisation, what would you do differently? Would you start to develop your leaders differently?
BestOfMe offers one-on-one executive coaching sessions and is in partnership with many established learning and development providers that offer leadership programmes such as those offered by Lifeskills Institute.”
Finally
Are you keen on creating an organisation of top performers? What difference would it make to you?Â
[1]The Extraordinary Leader: Turning Good Managers Into Great Leaders, John H Zenger & Joseph R Folkman
Original Article Published by Lifeskills Institute Pte Ltd
Lifeskills Institute is the strategic partner of Zenger Folkman for Singapore and Malaysia.
Chief Enabling Officer, Ian Tan is a Master Facilitator certified by Zenger Folkman.
Zenger Folkman is a strengths-based leadership development company helping leaders elevate their people and organisations. Co-founders Dr. Jack Zenger and Dr. Joe Folkman utilise empirical data and behavioral evidence to help leaders become extraordinary.
Explore Today
Explore how you can nurture your leaders to be great and effective for their teams through BestOfMe digital coaching platform.
Get a Coach
BestOfMe is a digital coaching platform with many professionally certified and experienced coaches, carefully selected by us.
Be the Best You
Discover BestOfMe with a discounted coaching session. Within 10 mins, you can engage a coach for an upcoming trial session and experience BestOfMe’s Digital Platform and its features.
In this trial, you will:
- Go through a self-assessment to help you identify your strengths, limitations and explore the best opportunities for growth and success
- Start a 30-45 mins coaching session with your preferred coach
- Experience BestOfMe’s digital platform and its available features
Sign up here to start your first coaching session.
Download BestOfMe app to access all your coaching needs anytime, anywhere.

You May Also Like…
Are you interested to introduce coaching in your school?
If you’re wondering about introducing coaching in your school, you’re on the right path to enhancing your teachers’ performance and students’ learning experience.
Revealing the Simplicity and Effectiveness of Solution-focused Coaching with Coach Josephine
Josephine has been using the Solution Focused (SF) approach since 2013. She likes it because it’s simple, flexible, and natural. It lets coaches ask the right questions in a way that fits the person they’re talking to. Josephine believes SF helps people change from the inside, which she has experienced personally. Ai Chin agrees with her, finding SF more practical than other coaching methods.
What is Digital Coaching: Are Its Benefits Over In-Person Coaching Worth Exploring?
If you’re someone who’s familiar with in-person coaching, but wondering if digital coaching could work for you, you’re not alone. Let’s take a closer look at what digital coaching is.